I completely agree; however, most aren't willing to take responsibility for their actions which is why you see the prevalent "return the car to stock and take it to the dealer" talk track. In modifying the vehicle you accept the risk of anything that goes wrong related to the modification. Pay to play and that...If you mod and your engine goes boom...jmho...But thats on the "modder" not Acura...
Yes, it will void your warranty if you take it to the dealership non-stock. Put the original back on before going to the dealer for any reason. Even an oil change. You might just get the hyper attentive tech that will note it on the repair order.So, has anyone added this intake and had any significant issues? I saw a youtube video talk about getting an occasional CEL after installing this intake. Also wondering if this is reason enough to void the engine warranty.
What? So basically mod or not modded your car can't be touch under the hood? Caus a stripped bolt or missing clip implies modification ? Lol.If there's a shred of evidence that anything was modified they'll probably find it. As far as anyone is aware, these engines don't tend to pop very frequently so there will probably be a fine-tooth comb applied to any that do. A stretched hose, a stripped bolt or screw, broken or missing clips- they'll flunk you.
Lol all you want. I think it's safe to assume this. I know the "burden of proof" is supposedly on the dealer, but how often does that actually work, in practice? The bleak reality is that dealers basically get away with whatever they want in this country.What? So basically mod or not modded your car can't be touch under the hood? Caus a stripped bolt or missing clip implies modification ? Lol.
Anyways. They have to prove that the modification directly impacted the failure. It's better not to go this route. Either don't mod it or keep the mods to a bare minimum in case something goes wrong and you can revert it to stock. I wouldn't go beyond intake or cat back exhaust if your worried about voiding warranty.
You have the right to bring your car to any certified mechanic for work. You don't have to go to the dealer for anything period. Which will not void your warranty. Most people including myself don't go to the dealership for anything unless it's warranty related.Lol all you want. I think it's safe to assume this. I know the "burden of proof" is supposedly on the dealer, but how often does that actually work, in practice? The bleak reality is that dealers basically get away with whatever they want in this country.
Just think about what business your average Joe Consumer would have poking around under the hood on a brand new car in the first place? Now evaluate that through the lens of a dealer looking at a car with a blown engine. I already mentioned catastrophic engine failure doesn't happen very often on these, right? If "reverting back to stock" leaves any evidence whatsoever, good luck.
As far as "bare minimum", I'd go as far as to say that an intake would be a risk. Exhaust I don't see it; if it's downstream from the cat there's no way to attribute that to an engine failure IMO* (*but somehow I wouldn't be surprised if a dealer tried to claim this...).
But from a strictly scientific perspective, could you truly claim that an intake could not lead to an engine failure? An intercooler? Aftermarket radiator?
All of this is of course on a case-by-case basis. So we're discussing a world of hypotheticals. With that being the case, reasonable logic dictates assuming a "worst-case scenario". I think all of the above are fair game (sans cat-back exhaust). So "revert back to stock" at your own risk.
You're going off in a completely irrelevant direction. I'm not talking about legitimate maintenance work by a 3rd party.You have the right to bring your car to any certified mechanic for work. You don't have to go to the dealer for anything period. Which will not void your warranty. Most people including myself don't go to the dealership for anything unless it's warranty related.
I bought my amg e63s straight from mercedes. It was a certified used vehicle and I bought the extended warranty. My 3rd party mechanic found they never preformed the transmission flush they were supposed to as a 30k mile vehicle, the passenger side panel that leads to the air filters all the clips were cracked and a previous. person tried to glue it back together.
Guess who paid for a new panel and the transmission service that my 3rd party mechanic performed ? Mercedes.. Alot of us don't go to the dealer unless it's warranty claims. Keeping a stock car and servicing it somewhere else in fear of dealership warranty void is some silly thinking.
I agree with you on the modifications. But you made it pretty clear on previous posts that unless the dealer touches it or they find "lose bolts or stretched hoses or the avg joe consumer" they'll use things like that to void the warranty. But I agree with you. Mod it and be prepared to suffer the consequences.You're going off in a completely irrelevant direction.
My point is that for those who think they can get away with modifying their car and "reverting to stock" if "something bad happens" are setting themselves up for failure.
Either mod and accept that it's likely on you in the unlikely event that things go south, or don't mod at all. This half-assed middle ground of assuming the dealer will have your back because of "your rights" is an incredibly silly way of thinking.
Yeah that was my only real point, is to dissuade this apparently prevalent philosophy that you can do whatever you want to your car and just take off all the mods if it blows up and the dealer will be none the wiser, and that's just dumb.I agree with you on the modifications. But you made it pretty clear on previous posts that unless the dealer touches it or they find "lose bolts or stretched hoses or the avg joe consumer" they'll use things like that to void the warranty. But I agree with you. Mod it and be prepared to suffer the consequences.