optronix
Senior Member
- Thread starter
- #1
Recently got around to doing some springtime mods in preparation for the fun season. Previously I had installed Eibach Pro-kit springs, and was pleased with the aesthetics from the drop but was quite disappointed in the increased understeer introduced from the additional rear camber vs the front due to the strut/multi-link suspension geometry. I was left with ~-1.5 front and -2.5 rear camber after the springs install. I am now sitting at -3.5 front camber in the most aggressive setting. Turn-in is noticeably improved from just mild street driving, I can't wait to get this thing in a setting where I can assess the expected elimination of understeer.
I would suggest anyone who has springs or coilovers (without "top hat" camber adjusters) to invest in these (there are a few options available, including Whiteline and I believe J's Racing, to name a few), because as previously mentioned the rear camber is going to be more affected than the front when the car is lowered. The alternative is to get a rear camber kit to add more positive camber to the rear to get it closer to factory spec. But for me, having more negative camber in the rear than the front is a net negative for this platform. I chose to "lean into it" for a more aggressive alignment because I don't put many miles on my car and also do track stuff.
And then there's the aesthetic advantage. Honestly the pics don't do it justice. The camber really does add just a bit more subtle aggressiveness to the overall look of the car without going full obnoxious "stance style"- especially when combined with the +45 offset wheels and the drop. Forgive the relative uncleanliness; I have yet to do the spring detail.
View attachment 238339
View attachment 238342
Before and after for reference:
View attachment 238341
View attachment 238340
I would suggest anyone who has springs or coilovers (without "top hat" camber adjusters) to invest in these (there are a few options available, including Whiteline and I believe J's Racing, to name a few), because as previously mentioned the rear camber is going to be more affected than the front when the car is lowered. The alternative is to get a rear camber kit to add more positive camber to the rear to get it closer to factory spec. But for me, having more negative camber in the rear than the front is a net negative for this platform. I chose to "lean into it" for a more aggressive alignment because I don't put many miles on my car and also do track stuff.
And then there's the aesthetic advantage. Honestly the pics don't do it justice. The camber really does add just a bit more subtle aggressiveness to the overall look of the car without going full obnoxious "stance style"- especially when combined with the +45 offset wheels and the drop. Forgive the relative uncleanliness; I have yet to do the spring detail.
View attachment 238339
View attachment 238342
Before and after for reference:
View attachment 238341
View attachment 238340
Sponsored
Attachments
-
0 bytes Views: 0
-
0 bytes Views: 0
-
0 bytes Views: 0
-
0 bytes Views: 0