Victorofhavoc
Senior Member
- First Name
- Gordan
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2024
- Threads
- 8
- Messages
- 786
- Reaction score
- 501
- Location
- Kansas City
- Car(s)
- Integra type s
See the its was the only Honda option to me. Ctr is too boy racer and just downright ugly to me. The omission of heated seats in the Midwest is also a no go.I don’t track, but I lean into my stuff. I’m about an hour away from HWY-129/Deals Gap/the dragon so I would get good value from the performance. I love my GTI, but I don’t like the unreliability and how small the back seats and hatch area are.
I will say in terms of equipment and fit and finish, the GTi punches above its price. I sat in an integra a-spec a few weeks ago, it felt nice but not on the same level as my wife’s RDX, nor my GTI.
Most people I see who have regrets on the ITS were hoping to buy a CTR but didn’t want to pay the ADM. I’m one of the few who loves just about everything the ITS does.
I've seen 5 or 6 ctr show up for sale in my area a few months back, and they're typically selling for 2-3k under msrp. Its is similar if adding accessories, but base sells for about msrp.
If you're doing more than 60% of what this car is capable of on the street, you're in the zone of scaring people around you. It pulls more G at 60-70% than most average cars are capable of. For street use, other cars have lower limits and would provide more fun before being dangerous. Namely, much sportier cars like the ft86 twins and miata.
Not trying to steer you away from it, I'm just being realistic. If you want 4 doors, a manual, "low cost", a very aggressive street alignment, and you think the ctr is ugly, then this is the car for you. There is nothing else that delivers this kind of package today... Except for the elantra N, which doesn't count for the same reason the ctr doesn't.
Sponsored